I should have talked about “saving the children”. I didn’t want my post to get too long, so there were some subjects I didn’t touch upon.

You have an incredibly valid point, though. Both the American Pediatrics Association and American Psychological Association have done extensive research on children living in same-sex households. What they found was this:

-children of GLBT individuals were as well adjusted (if not more) than children in heterosexual households

-children in GLBT households showed more compassion for others than children in heterosexual households

-children in GLBT households were as likely as children in heterosexual households to actually be GLBT themselves (which wasn’t an overwhelming statistic)

-children in GLBT households (when GLBT themselves) were more willing to accept themselves than those raised in heterosexual households

There is absolutely NO HARM to children and with in vitro, adoption options, and sperm banks, GLBT individuals are not a threat to waning populations.

I personally believe that people who are GLBT just might be “made that way” as a way to control the population. Not every person on the Earth is designed to have their own children. Otherwise, we’d be overpopulated.

Essentially, the no orgies was used as a smokescreen to condemn polytheistic beliefs.

The pagan writers had an answer for why they met in secret, in caves, crypts, or other hidden places: orgies.

We tend to think of the Ancient Romans as a pretty randy lot, but many of the religious practices tended to the ascetic. Those Christians talked about upsetting the order. They had to be perverts, right?

Each side accused the other of sexual sins.